"Cardinal Numbers" - The 2011
Season
We are pleased to bring you our
statistical breakdown of Stanford's 2011 season. For the second straight season,
Stanford's statistical performance was simply outstanding. The short summary is
that Stanford was able to maintain and even improve on last season's superb
offensive performance. Stanford's defense was good, especially against the run,
although not quite up to last year's standard. The performance of the Cardinal's
special teams was generally in the middle of the pack, with some bright
spots.
Offense
Stanford had a record-setting
season on offense. This year's offense managed to improve slightly on last
year's excellent performance:
| Offense: 2010 vs. 2011 |
| | 2010 | 2011 |
| Points/game | 40.3 | 43.2 |
| First
downs/game | 24.3 | 25.0 |
| Total
yards/game | 472 | 489 |
| Yards/play | 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Rushing
yards/game | 214 | 211 |
| Rushing yards/game
(excluding sacks) | 218 | 216 |
| Rushing
yards/attempt | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Rushing yards/attempt
(excluding sacks) | 5.3 | 5.6 |
| Passing
yards/game | 259 | 279 |
| Passing
yards/attempt | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Pass efficiency
rating | 168.4 | 169.5 |
| Sacks
allowed/game | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Pass attempts per sack
allowed | 63 | 38 |
| Third down conversion
rate | 58% | 53% |
Stanford's offense was among the
top 10 in the NCAA in numerous categories, including scoring and total
offense:
2011 Offense NCAA Rankings |
| Scoring
(Points/Game) | 43.2 | 7th |
| Total Offense
(Yards/Game) | 489 | 8th |
| Yards Per Play | 6.8 | 6th |
| First Downs Per
Game | 25.0 | 10th |
| Pass Efficiency
Rating | 169.5 | 5th |
| Yards per Pass
Attempt | 8.7 | 8th |
| Sacks Allowed per
Game | 0.8 | 7th |
| Tackles for Loss Allowed
per Game | 3.2 | 1st |
| Third Down
Conversions | 53% | 3rd |
| Red Zone
Efficiency | 97% | 1st |
| Time of Possession per
Game | 33:47 | 5th |
Stanford's offense ranked 8th in
the nation in the number of 20+ yard plays per game, and 17th in the number of
30+ yard plays per game.
For the fifth straight year,
Stanford's offense improved its performance, improving from Stanford's
worst-ever offense five years ago to arguably its best ever:
Offensive Improvement 2006-2011 |
| Year | Yards/Game | Points/Game |
| 2006 | 232 | 10.6 |
| 2007 | 323 | 19.6 |
| 2008 | 352 | 26.3 |
| 2009 | 428 | 35.5 |
| 2010 | 472 | 40.3 |
| 2010 | 489 | 43.2 |
For the second straight season,
Stanford set a new school record for scoring offense:
| Scoring |
| Year | Coach/QB | Points/Game |
| 2011 | Shaw/Luck | 43.2 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Luck | 40.3 |
| 1999 | Willingham/Husak | 37.2 |
| 2001 | Willingham/Fasani | 37.1 |
| 2009 | Harbaugh/Luck | 35.5 |
| 1969 | Ralston/Plunkett | 34.9 |
| 1949 | Schwartz/Kerkorian | 33.3 |
| 1991 | Green/Stenstrom | 31.9 |
| 1923 | Kerr/Nevers
(FB) | 31.6 |
| 1995 | Willingham/Butterfield | 30.1 |
[Note: In accordance with NCAA
policy, bowl games were not counted in the statistics until 2002.]
This year's offense ranks second
in Stanford history in yards per game, just behind Jim Plunkett's explosive 1969
team:
| Total Offense |
| Year | Coach/QB | Yards/Game |
| 1969 | Ralston/Plunkett | 492 |
| 2011 | Shaw/Luck | 489 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Luck | 472 |
| 1999 | Willingham/Husak | 467 |
| 2001 | Willingham/Fasani | 452 |
| 1994 | Walsh/Stenstrom | 445 |
| 1981 | Wiggin/Elway | 444 |
| 1978 | Walsh/Dils | 436 |
| 1980 | Wiggin/Elway | 433 |
| 1977 | Walsh/Benjamin | 432 |
Based on yards per play, this
year's offense was the most productive offense in Stanford history, just ahead
of last year's team:
| Yards per Offensive Play |
| Year | Coach/QB | Yards/Play |
| 2011 | Shaw/Luck | 6.8 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Luck | 6.7 |
| 2009 | Harbaugh/Luck | 6.5 |
| 1999 | Willingham/Husak | 6.5 |
| 2001 | Willingham/Fasani | 5.9 |
| 1994 | Walsh/Stenstrom | 5.9 |
| 1982 | Wiggin/Elway | 5.9 |
| 1969 | Ralston/Plunkett | 5.8 |
| 1993 | Walsh/Stenstrom | 5.7 |
| 1980 | Wiggin/Elway | 5.6 |
Rushing
Offense
Stanford's running game once
again was a major strength. Stanford's running game has been producing at a
consistently high level for the last several years:
Rushing Yards 2009 - 2011 |
| | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| Rushing Yards | 2,837 | 2,779 | 2,738 |
| Rushing
Yards/Game | 218 | 214 | 211 |
| Rushing
Yards/Attempt | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Stanford's rushing attack ranked
2nd in the Pac 10 in rushing yards per game, 2nd in rushing yards per attempt,
and 2nd in rushing TDs (behind Oregon in each case). Among the 67 BCS teams,
Stanford ranked in the top 10 in all three of those categories. This year's team
ranks among the top rushing teams in Stanford history:
| Rushing Yards Per Game |
| Year | Coach/Leading
Rusher | Yards/Game |
| 1949 | Schwartz/Hugasian | 248 |
| 1957 | Taylor/Shea | 226 |
| 2009 | Harbaugh/Gerhart | 218 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Taylor | 214 |
| 2011 | Shaw/Taylor | 211 |
| 2001 | Willingham/Allen | 201 |
| 2008 | Harbaugh/Gerhart | 200 |
Although this year's rushing
yardage was just a little less than last year's, Stanford's running backs
actually were more productive this year. The running backs gained an additional
21 yards per game this year, and the running backs' combined average went up
from 4.9 yards per carry to 5.4 yards per carry. The increased production by the
running backs made up for a decrease in rushing yards by the quarterbacks.
Andrew Luck and Alex Loukas combined for 603 rushing yards in 2010, while Luck
and Brett Nottingham accounted for just 160 rushing yards in 2011.
Rushing Yards 2010 vs.
2011 |
| | 2010 | 2011 | Change |
| Running backs | 2,069 | 2,341 | +272 |
| Fullbacks | 46 | 125 | +79 |
| WRs and others | 61 | 112 | +51 |
| Quarterbacks | 603 | 160 | -443 |
| Total | 2,779 | 2,738 | -41 |
Stanford averaged 5.3 yards per
carry this year, falling short of the school record by just .007 yards per
carry. The Cardinal's average yards per carry have been remarkably consistent
over the last three seasons -- 5.3, 5.2, 5.3. The top four averages in school
history have come in the last four seasons:
| Rushing Yards Per Attempt |
| Year | Coach/Leading
Rusher | Yards/Attempt |
| 2009 | Harbaugh/Gerhart | 5.3 |
| 2011 | Shaw/Taylor | 5.3 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Taylor | 5.2 |
| 2008 | Harbaugh/Gerhart | 4.9 |
| 1957 | Taylor/Shea | 4.5 |
| 2001 | Willingham/Allen | 4.4 |
| 1969 | Ralston/Brown | 4.3 |
Stanford's strong performance in
average yards per carry came despite a slight increase in the number of sacks
allowed. Sacks reduce average yards per carry. When sacks are excluded from last
season's figures, Stanford averaged 5.6 yards per carry for the season, which is
outstanding. That compares to 5.4 yards per carry in 2009 and 5.3 yards per
carry in 2010, excluding sacks.
Passing
Offense
Stanford threw the ball somewhat
more this year than last year. Stanford still was a power running team and
maintained its running game at essentially the same level as last year. But at
the same time, the Cardinal's play-selection mix shifted slightly toward the
pass. This was a continuation of a shift that began last year:
| Play Selection 2008 - 2011 |
| | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| Rushing Attempts per
Game | 40.8 | 41.2 | 41.2 | 39.8 |
| Passing Attempts per
Game | 23.9 | 24.1 | 29.2 | 32.1 |
| Run/Pass Mix | 63% -
37% | 63% -
37% | 59% -
41% | 55% -
45% |
The Cardinal's passing game was
highly effective, essentially matching last year's pass efficiency rating.
Stanford threw more than last year and gained an additional 20 passing yards per
game, while maintaining efficiency at a high level:
| Passing Offense |
| | 2010 | 2011 |
| Attempts per
Game | 29.2 | 32.1 |
| Completions per
Game | 20.5 | 22.8 |
| Completion Pct. | 70.2% | 71.2% |
| Passing Yards | 3,363 | 3,623 |
| Passing
Yards/Game | 259 | 279 |
| Yards/Attempt | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Yards/Completion | 12.6 | 12.2 |
| TD passes | 32 | 38 |
| Interceptions | 8 | 10 |
| Pass Efficiency
Rating | 168.4 | 169.5 |
Stanford finished fifth in the
nation in pass efficiency rating with a rating of 169.5, breaking the school
record of 168.4 set last year. Passing yards, touchdown passes, and completion
percentage went up, while yards per pass attempt went down slightly. For the
third straight year, Stanford was in the range of 8.7 to 8.9 yards per pass
attempt, which is excellent. Those last three seasons are three of Stanford's
top four seasons ever in yards per pass attempt:
| Yards Per Pass Attempt |
| Year | Coach/Quarterback | Yards/Attempt |
| 1999 | Willingham/Husak | 9.0 |
| 2010 | Harbaugh/Luck | 8.9 |
| 2009 | Harbaugh/Luck | 8.7 |
| 2011 | Shaw/Luck | 8.7 |
| 1968 | Ralston/Plunkett | 8.5 |
The focus of the passing game
shifted from the wide receivers to the tight ends and the backs. Stanford's wide
receivers accounted for just 43% of the team's receptions this season, compared
to a more typical wide receiver share of 55%-75%. This year's 43% is the lowest
percentage of receptions for Stanford's wide receivers during the last 18
seasons, which is as far back as my data go. The tight ends' percentage of the
team's receptions went up to 29%, which is the highest percentage of receptions
for Stanford's tight ends during those 18 seasons. And the percentage of
receptions by fullbacks was 12%, which is the highest percentage of receptions
by fullbacks since Bill Walsh's last year, 1994.
In addition to catching fewer
passes, the Stanford wide receivers gained fewer yards per catch. The wide
receivers averaged 12.7 yards per catch, down from 13.6 yards per catch the
previous season. On the other hand, the tight ends averaged 15.8 yards per
catch, which is an exceptional figure for tight ends. Thus, the statistics
reflect what we already knew -- Stanford's deep passing threat came primarily
from its tight ends, not its wide receivers. The use of the tight ends as deep
threats allowed Stanford to average 12.2 yards per completion, slightly higher
than the national average.
| Pass Receptions, 2010 vs. 2011 |
| | 2010 | 2011 |
| | Percentage of Receptions | Yards per Reception | Percentage of Receptions | Yards per Reception |
| Wide Receivers | 56% | 13.6
yds | 43% | 12.7
yds |
| Tight Ends | 25% | 13.0
yds | 29% | 15.8
yds |
| Running Backs | 15% | 10.0
yds | 16% | 7.4
yds |
| Fullbacks | 4% | 8.3
yds | 12% | 8.0
yds |
Note: These figures do not include one reception by a QB in 2009 & 2011 and one reception by an OL in
2010 |
What can we say about Andrew
Luck? Luck's accomplishments on the field go far beyond ready measurement by
statistics. Nevertheless, here are some of Luck's statistical achievements for
the season and his career:
| Andrew Luck |
| NCAA Active Career Leader: |
| Most yards per pass
attempt, career | 8.9 |
| Most total offense yards
per play, career | 8.5 |
| Pac 12 Records: |
| Highest pass efficiency
rating, career | 162.8 |
| Highest completion
percentage, career | 67.0% |
| Most yards per pass
attempt, career | 8.9 |
| Highest completion
percentage, season | 71.3%
(2011) |
| Stanford Career Records: |
| Most touchdown passes,
career | 82 |
| Most total offense yards,
career | 10,387 |
| Highest pass efficiency
rating, career | 162.8 |
| Highest completion
percentage, career | 67.0% |
| Most yards per pass
attempt, career | 8.9 |
| Most rushing yards by a
QB, career | 957 |
| Most wins by a starting
QB, career | 31 |
| Highest winning
percentage by a starting QB, career | .816
|
| Stanford Single Season Records: |
| Most touchdown passes,
season | 37
(2011) |
| Most total offense yards,
season | 3,791
(2010) |
| Highest pass efficiency
rating, season | 170.2
(2010) |
| Highest completion
percentage, season | 71.3%
(2011) |
| Most yards per pass
attempt, season | 9.0
(2010) |
| Most rushing yards by a
QB, season | 453
(2010) |
Stanford gave up relatively few
sacks, allowing just 11 sacks for the season -- the 7th fewest in the nation.
That was, however, up from than last year, when remarkably, the Cardinal
allowed just 6 sacks.
Defense
In 2010, Stanford's defense took
a huge leap forward, going from a below-average defense to a very good one. This
season, the defense continued to play at a high level, although not quite up to
the standards of 2010.
In 2010, Stanford had one of the
top defenses in the Pac 10, ranking 1st in scoring defense, 2nd in total
defense, 2nd in rushing defense, and 2nd in pass efficiency defense. This past
season, Stanford was again one of the conference's top defensive teams,
finishing 2nd in scoring defense, 2nd in total defense, 1st in rushing defense,
and 5th in pass efficiency defense.
Nationally, out of 120 teams,
Stanford finished an outstanding 3rd in rushing defense. However, Stanford
finished just 73rd in pass efficiency defense. Overall, Stanford was 30th in
scoring defense and 26th in total defense -- in the top 25%, but not an elite
defense.
In a line by line comparison to
last season, Stanford's defense showed a great improvement in rushing defense, a
decline in pass defense, and a smaller decline in overall defense:
| Defense: 2010 vs. 2011 |
| | 2010 | 2011 |
| Points
allowed/game | 17.4 | 21.9 |
| First downs
allowed/game | 18.5 | 17.5 |
| Total yards
allowed/game | 323 | 338 |
| Yards
allowed/play | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Rushing yards
allowed/game | 121 | 84 |
| Rushing yards
allowed/game (excl. sacks) | 139 | 108 |
| Rushing yards
allowed/attempt | 3.9 | 3.0 |
| Rushing yards
allowed/attempt (excl. sacks) | 4.9 | 4.3 |
| Passing yards
allowed/game | 202 | 253 |
| Passing yards
allowed/attempt | 6.2 | 7.3 |
| Pass efficiency
defense | 112.8 | 132.9 |
| Sacks/game | 2.8 | 3.0 |
| Opponent pass attempts
per sack | 11.8 | 11.6 |
| Tackles for
loss/game | 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Third down conversion
rate allowed | 37% | 31% |
Stanford's defense allowed only
one opponent (Washington) to gain as many as 400 yards in regulation. (Stanford
held both USC and Oklahoma State under 400 yards in regulation, but both went
over 400 yards in overtime.) Stanford allowed more yards and more points in the
second half of the season than in the first half. But that is not surprising
because all of Stanford's strongest opponents were in the second half of
Stanford's schedule, including three opponents that finished in the top 6 of the
final AP poll -- Oregon, Oklahoma State, and USC.
| 2011 Defense: First Half vs. Second Half of Season |
| | First 6
Games | Last 7
Games |
| Points
allowed/game | 11.2 | 31.1 |
| Total yards
allowed/game | 295 | 374 |
| Rushing yards
allowed/game | 60 | 106 |
| Passing yards
allowed/game | 235 | 269 |
These statistics for the second
half of the season are slightly distorted by the two overtime games. Excluding
overtime, Stanford allowed 28.7 points per game and 362 yards per game in the
second half of the season.
After making progress in 2010 in
reducing the number of big plays allowed, Stanford regressed somewhat in
2011:
| 30+ Yard Gains Allowed |
| | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| Total 30+ Yard Gains
Allowed | 25 | 13 | 20 |
| 30+ Yard Runs
Allowed | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| 30+ Yard Passes
Allowed | 19 | 11 | 15 |
Allowing big plays was a
weakness in an otherwise good defense. Stanford did an excellent job of
preventing long, methodical drives. The Cardinal defense allowed a third down
conversion rate of just 31%, which ranked 6th in the nation. Only 9% of
opponents' drives lasted 10 plays or more, which was the 8th best figure in the
nation. So, Stanford did a good job of getting opponents off the field most of
the time. But Stanford's defense had a penchant for giving up the occasional
long play. Notably, although Stanford held both Oregon and Oklahoma State under
400 yards in regulation, Stanford's defense allowed five touchdowns of 40+ yards
in those two games. Those five 40+ yard touchdowns were crucial to the
disappointing outcomes of those games.
Rushing
Defense
Stanford had one of its best
rushing defenses ever this season. Stanford allowed just 84.4 yards per game,
which ranked third in the NCAA. That was the fewest rushing yards per game
allowed by a Stanford team since at least 1965, which is as far back as my
records go.
Rushing Yards Allowed Per Game (since
1965) |
| Year | Coach | Yards/Game |
| 2011 | Shaw | 84 |
| 1986 | Elway | 101 |
| 2001 | Willingham | 110 |
| 1969 | Ralston | 110 |
| 1971 | Ralston | 117 |
One reason for the low number of
opponent rushing yards was the fact that Stanford's opponents didn't run the
ball much. Stanford's defense faced just 27.9 rushing attempts per game, the
fewest in the nation.
But that wasn't the only reason
for Stanford's strong rushing defense statistics. Stanford also allowed a mere
3.0 yards per rushing attempt, which ranked 11th in the nation. That was a big
improvement over last year, when Stanford allowed 3.9 yards per rushing attempt
(43rd in the nation). The average of 3.0 yards allowed per rushing attempt was
among Stanford's all-time best figures in that category:
Rushing Yards Allowed Per Attempt (since 1965) |
| Year | Coach | Yards/Attempt |
| 1971 | Ralston | 2.5 |
| 1969 | Ralston | 2.6 |
| 1970 | Ralston | 2.7 |
| 1986 | Elway | 2.7 |
| 2011 | Shaw | 3.0 |
| 1981 | Wiggin | 3.0 |
Stanford's defense generated 6.8
tackles for loss per game, which ranked 28th in the nation. This was a
substantial improvement over 2010 (5.5 tackles for loss per game, 75th in the
nation) and 2009 (4.5 tackles for loss per game, 108th in the
nation).
Pass
Defense
After a major improvement in
pass defense in 2010, the Cardinal pass defense took a step back this
year:
Pass Defense, 2009 to 2011 NCAA
Rankings |
| | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 |
| Pass Efficiency
Defense | 98th | 16th | 73rd |
| Passing Yards Allowed per
Game | 110th | 35th | 95th |
| Yards Allowed per
Attempt | 86th | 19th | 76th |
| Interceptions per
Game | 99th | 18th | 104th |
Stanford's pass defense declined
in every category this season compared to the previous year. This decline
probably cannot be blamed on a less effective pass rush. Stanford's pass rush
improved from 2.8 sacks per game last year (14th in the nation) to 3.0 sacks per
game this year (11th nationally). Stanford's pass rush was a team effort.
Fifteen Stanford defenders recorded at least half a sack. Chase Thomas led a
group of seven players with at least two sacks each:
Turnovers
Stanford's turnover margin of +5
was good, but not great. Stanford's per-game turnover margin of +0.38 per game
was 30th in the nation. In 2010, Stanford's turnover margin was significantly
better at +13.
Stanford did well in taking care
of the ball. For the third consecutive season, Stanford committed 17 turnovers,
which was the 14th lowest figure in the nation this year. Stanford lost only 7
fumbles during the season, which was the fewest fumbles Stanford has lost in a
season since 1995 (also 7). Unfortunately, 3 of the 7 lost fumbles came in one
game, the Oregon game.
Stanford didn't do as well in
taking the ball away from the opponent. Stanford's 22 takeaways ranked 59th
nationally. This year's 22 takeaways were down from 30 takeaways a year ago.
Notably, interceptions by the Stanford defense declined from 18 last year to 7
this year.
Over the years, the turnover
margin has been a pretty good indicator of wins and losses. Looking at all of
Stanford's games for the last 17 seasons, the team with the advantage in
turnovers has won 75% of the time. That general relationship was evident this
year. Stanford went 6-0 in games in which it had the turnover advantage, while
going just 2-2 in games in which the opponent had the turnover advantage. (The
other three games were even in turnovers.) Stanford's -3 turnover margin against
Oregon was particularly harmful. Of Stanford's 17 turnovers this season, 5 of
them came in the Oregon game. Stanford had just 12 turnovers in the other 12
games combined.
Special
Teams
Stanford's special teams were
more or less average this year, with a few above-average aspects.
The punting team didn't get many
opportunities. Stanford punted 37 times, which is just 2.8 punts per game, the
second fewest in the nation. Only Baylor punted less often. Stanford's average
of 40.8 yards per punt was fair-to-middling, ranking 53rd in the nation.
Individually, David Green averaged 41.7 yards per punt, which was 9th in the
Pac-12. Stanford did not allow any blocked punts.
Stanford did a pretty good job
of punt coverage. Only 11 Stanford punts were returned for a total of 70 punt
return yards, or 5.4 punt return yards per game. On the 11 punts that were
returned, Stanford allowed an average of 6.4 yards, which ranked 40th
nationally. Stanford was not hurt by any punt returns this year. Overall,
Stanford's net punting average (net of returns and touchbacks) was 36.2 yards
per punt, which was 67th nationally. That was slightly below last year's net
punting average of 36.8 yards.
Stanford's punt return team was
good, with an average of 11.3 yards per return (23rd in the nation). This was an
improvement from last year's average of 10.0 yards per return. Drew Terrell
averaged 12.0 yards per punt return, which was 12th in the nation and led the
Pac-12.
The Cardinal struggled with
kickoffs at times this year. As a team, Stanford averaged 63.9 yards per kickoff
(53rd in the nation), which means the average kickoff carried to the 6 yard
line. Stanford's touchback percentage of 9.1% ranked 86th in the nation. This
was down from Nate Whitaker's excellent 28.9% touchback percentage last year.
When Jordan Williamson was healthy, Stanford's kickoffs were considerably
better. Williamson averaged 66.5 yards per kickoff, which was 12th in the nation
and best in the Pac-12. About one-third of the team's kickoffs were handled by
Ben Rhyne and Eric Whitaker, who had a combined average of 58.9 yards per
kickoff -- 7.6 yards less than Williamson's average.
Stanford allowed an average of
21.3 yards per kickoff return, which was 54th in the nation. Overall, taking
into account the length of the kickoff and the return, Stanford averaged a net
of 44.0 yards per kickoff, which was a couple yards less than the Cardinal's
46.2 yard net kickoff average last year.
Stanford's kickoff return team
averaged 22.6 yards per return, which was 46th in the nation. That was up from
21.8 yards per return last year. Ty Montgomery emerged as a good return threat
with an average of 25.2 yards. He ranked 4th in the Pac-12 and 32nd in the
nation.
The Cardinal's field goal
kicking was good in the regular season. In the first seven games, Jordan
Williamson made 11 of 12 FG attempts, with his only miss from 47 yards. With
Williamson injured, Eric Whitaker took over for three games and made 4 of 5 FG
attempts, with his only miss from 48 yards. So the kickers were a combined 15 of
17 through ten games. Williamson returned in the last two games of the season
and made 1 of 3 attempts, missing from 33 and 49 yards. For the regular season,
then, Stanford made 16 of 20 FG attempts, with 3 of the 4 misses coming from 47
yards or farther. From 46 yards or less, the Cardinal made 16 of 17 FG attempts
in the regular season. Of course, the Fiesta Bowl was a disaster. Stanford made
just 1 of 4 FG attempts, with the 3 misses coming from 41, 35, and 43 yards. For
the season, Stanford made 70.8% of FG attempts, which ranked 54th
nationally.
Stanford blocked one FG attempt,
with Max Bergen blocking the kick and returning it for a TD.
In summary, Stanford's special
teams were mostly in the middle of the pack, with some above-average
areas.
Random
Numbers
* Stanford's # 7 ranking in the
final AP poll was tied for its third-highest AP ranking ever, behind the # 2
ranked 1940 "Wow Boys" team and the # 4 ranked Orange Bowl team last season.
Stanford also finished # 7 under Chuck Taylor in 1951. (The AP poll began in
1936.)
* This was the second time
Stanford has finished in the top 10 in the AP poll in back-to-back seasons.
Stanford's Rose Bowl teams of 1970 and 1971 finished # 8 and # 10
respectively.
* Stanford has been in the top
10 in the AP poll for 23 consecutive polls, going back to October 2010. That is
Stanford's longest top 10 streak by far. The previous best was 8 straight weeks
in the top 10 in 1940.
* Stanford has been ranked in 31
consecutive AP polls, which is the second longest streak in school history
behind a 43-week streak in 1969-72.
* Andrew Luck became the first
Stanford quarterback to pass for 3,000 yards in a season in two different
seasons. He is second on both the season and career passing yardage lists:
| Passing Yards, Season |
| Player | Year | Yards |
| Steve Stenstrom | 1993 | 3,627 |
| Andrew Luck | 2011 | 3,517 |
| Andrew Luck | 2010 | 3,338 |
| John Elway | 1982 | 3,242 |
| Todd Husak | 1998 | 3,092 |
| Passing Yards, Career |
| Player | Years | Yards |
| Steve Stenstrom | 1991-94 | 10,531 |
| Andrew Luck | 2009-11 | 9,430 |
| John Elway | 1979-82 | 9,349 |
| John Paye | 1983-86 | 7,669 |
| Jim Plunkett | 1968-70 | 7,544 |
* Luck's career pass efficiency
rating of 162.8 is the 8th best in NCAA Division I history, and the 4th best
ever for a player in a BCS conference.
* Stepfan Taylor gained the
second most rushing yards in a season in Stanford history. The top four
individual single-season rushing yardage totals in school history have come in
the last four seasons (although these last four seasons had 12 or 13 games
rather than the 11 games that used to be standard). Toby Gerhart's school
rushing record of 1,136 yards in 2008 has been surpassed every season since
then:
| Rushing Yards, Season |
| Player | Year | Yards |
| Toby Gerhart | 2009 | 1,871 |
| Stepfan Taylor | 2011 | 1,330 |
| Stepfan Taylor | 2010 | 1,137 |
| Toby Gerhart | 2008 | 1,136 |
| Tommy Vardell | 1991 | 1,084 |
| Darrin Nelson | 1977 | 1,069 |
* Stepfan Taylor is now 4th on
Stanford's career rushing list. He needs 1,264 rushing yards next season to
break Darrin Nelson's school record:
| Rushing Yards, Career |
| Player | Years | Yards |
| Darrin Nelson | 1977-81 | 4,033 |
| Toby Gerhart | 2006-09 | 3,522 |
| Brad Muster | 1984-87 | 2,940 |
| Stepfan Taylor | 2009-11 | 2,770 |
* Stepfan Taylor has scored 30
TDs in his Stanford career -- 27 rushing TDs, 3 receiving TDs. He needs 14 TDs
this coming season to match Toby Gerhart's school record of 44 career
TDs:
| Career Touchdowns |
| Player | Years | TDs |
| Toby Gerhart | 2006-09 | 44 |
| Darrin Nelson | 1977-81 | 40 |
| Tommy Vardell | 1988-91 | 37 |
| Brad Muster | 1984-87 | 33 |
| Vincent White | 1979-82 | 31 |
| Ken Margerum | 1977-80 | 30 |
| Stepfan Taylor | 2009-11 | 30 |
* Ten Stanford players have had
career rushing averages of 5.0 yards per attempt or better (minimum 600 career
rushing yards). Three of those ten players were on this season's team: Andrew
Luck (5.9), Stepfan Taylor (5.3), and Tyler Gaffney (5.1).
* Jeremy Stewart scored 14
career rushing TDs, which ties him with Hillary Shockley for 14th on Stanford's
career rushing TD list.
* Coby Fleener and Chris Owusu
finished their Stanford careers with almost the same career receiving yardage --
1,543 yards for Fleener, 1,534 yards for Owusu.
* Coby Fleener was just the
second Stanford player in the last 30 years to make 10 or more touchdown catches
in a season (along with Troy Walters in 1999). Fleener is in the top 5 in
Stanford history in both single-season TD receptions and career TD receptions.
He is the top tight end in Stanford history in both categories:
| TD
Receptions, Season |
| Player | Year | TDs |
| James Lofton | 1977 | 12 |
| Ken Margerum | 1980 | 11 |
| Ken Margerum | 1979 | 10 |
| Troy Walters | 1999 | 10 |
| Coby Fleener | 2011 | 10 |
| TD
Receptions, Career |
| Player | Years | TDs |
| Ken Margerum | 1977-80 | 30 |
| Troy Walters | 1996-99 | 26 |
| DeRonnie Pitts | 1997-00 | 24 |
| Justin Armour | 1991-94 | 20 |
| Tony Hill | 1973-76 | 18 |
| Vincent White | 1979-82 | 18 |
| Coby Fleener | 2008-11 | 18 |
* Coby Fleener's average of 19.6
yards per reception was the 5th best average in Stanford history, and the best
ever for a Stanford tight end.
* Chris Owusu set a school
record for career kickoff return yards (2,132 yards). He ranks second in career
kickoff return average (27.3 yards/return), behind Ron Inge (27.8
yards/return).
* Chris Owusu is 8th in Stanford
history in career all-purpose yards, with 3,842 yards.
* Andrew Luck threw TD passes to
11 different receivers. Every Stanford player with 7 or more receptions made at
least one TD catch.
* For the first time in school
history, three different players scored 10 or more TDs in the same season.
Stepfan Taylor scored 12 TDs, while Coby Fleener and Jeremy Stewart scored 10
TDs each.
* Stanford has won 13 of its
last 14 home games. Over the last 4+ seasons, going back to the 2007 Big Game,
Stanford has a home-field record of 23-3.
* Stanford has won 4 out of 5
games against USC for the first time since 1933-37. That was also the last time
Stanford defeated USC three straight times in the Coliseum. Stanford has a
record of 7-6 against USC since 1999.
* The triple-overtime 56-48 win
over USC was the only game in Stanford history to extend beyond one overtime
period.
* Stanford went undefeated in
road games this season, with a 5-0 record. It was Stanford's first undefeated
season on the road since 1971. (This does not include bowl games, which are
neutral-site games rather than road games.)
* Stanford's average home
attendance of 49,997 set a record for the new stadium, and was Stanford's
highest average attendance since 2001.
Do you have a "premium" subscription to The
Bootleg? If not, then you are seriously
missing out on all the top Cardinal coverage we provide daily on our
award-winning website. Sign up today for the biggest, baddest
and best in Stanford sports coverage with TheBootleg.com ( sign-up)!